Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal surgery
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Dissemination metastasis after laparoscopic colorectal surgery versus conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer: a metanalysis.
PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare the risk of dissemination metastasis (wound, port-side metastases and peritoneal seeding) after laparoscopic colorectal surgery and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Authors searched relevant randomized controlled trials between January 1998 and July 2012. RESULTS Wound, port-si...
متن کاملRobotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
BACKGROUND Robotic approaches have become increasingly used for colorectal surgery. The aim of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of robotic colorectal procedures in an adult population. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review of articles in both PubMed and Embase comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal procedures was performed. Clinical trials and observational studies in an adu...
متن کاملSingle Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery, Comparative Study
Background: Conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy has proven to be an effective and safe procedure in expert hands. Aiming at further decrease in surgical trauma and to improve the overall outcomes, Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) has emerged in the field of colorectal surgery. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted on 34 patients in...
متن کاملHand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer
AIM This meta-analysis aims to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional open surgery (OS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and to explore the safety, feasibility of HALS for CRC surgery. METHODS A systematic literature search with no limits was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Medline. The last search was performed on...
متن کاملMini-Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive endoscopic surgery has become an acceptable method for gynecologic indications for more than 20 years. We aimed to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between mini-laparoscopic surgery (MLS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for benign adnexal masses. As far as we know, no comparative study exists between these two minimal invasive procedures. METHOD...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Acta chirurgica Iugoslavica
سال: 2002
ISSN: 0354-950X,2406-0887
DOI: 10.2298/aci0202077v